($448, Badgley Mischka, Bluefly)I am feeling SO many emotions about this dress, all of them POSITIVE and overwhelming. It's sorta what I was hoping for with my Nicole Miller fail, but this looks even more fantasticosa! I'm not a fan of the wrap, but no big whoop, right?
($402, Badgley Mischka, Bluefly)
($402, Badgley Mischka, Bluefly)Puh-retty!
($331, Badgley Mischka, Bluefly)
($331, Badgley Mischka, Bluefly)I'm not usually a fan of pleats like these, but I like the structured bib. Cool for alt-bridesmaids dresses!
($501, Amsale, Bluefly)
($501, Amsale, Bluefly)I mean, look me in the EYE and TELL me that Amsale's "Duet" gown isn't to DIE! It's simple but commanding and not overwhelming tacky. And that sexy back! LOVE! Also, short ladies, you CAN wear full gowns. And I love that this is full but not like the width of a sedan. This width is perfect for a shortie like myself.
($125, Vera Wang, Bluefly)
($125, Vera Wang, Bluefly)Definitely not for me, but if you're looking for a more traditional wedding gown, um, HI! This Vera Wang is like four cents, relatively speaking. I could see this being really purdy on a tall, thin type.
($331, Vera Wang, Bluefly)
($331, Vera Wang, Bluefly)Much better on shorties or tall types!
5 comments:
So many gorgeous options! That little champagne number at the end is particularly pretty.
The Amsale looks like a standard boring wedding dress after it's spent a week in the bottom of my laundry basket. NO. The jeweled Vera Wang, on the other hand, is divine!
I am completely & totally in love with that first dress & would wear it if I was getting married.
the first dress is SOOO IT! GAH I'm dying
yah mamma might buy it! and by "mamma," i mean... ME?
Post a Comment