Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Five Of The Ugliest Shoes I've Seen In Ages

Horbs shoes, in no particular order. Because does ugly really need an order?

($720, Dolce & Gabbana, Luisaviaroma.com)
Sure The Elton John Museum is aware of the recent robbery that took place there...

($1324, Christian Louboutin, Luisaviaroma.com)
Nope. Sorry. You either get to be a boat shoe OR a stiletto, but not both. (Sorry, Fergie.)


($1306, Valentino, Luisaviaroma.com)
It's bad enough that Bea Arthur recently passed away. Did Valentino really have to DEFACE the Golden Girls' beloved couch on top of it?



($595, Pucci, Net-a-porter.com)
These could actually be cute if... no wait. They could never be cute.

($41, Costumes4less.com)
Six and a half inches of faux wood and weep.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

oh wow! i actually think the puccis are okay and the valentinos don't offend me, but the rest...gack. the stiletto slingback boat shoe is the #1 offender IMO. so wrong!

Anonymous said...

Yeah, those Puccis aren't too offensive, but the rest? BLEEEARRRGH!

soilikethelike said...

aww i'm loving those boat shoe stilettos, looks like i'm the only one! but eeek, to the price tag.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...